UAP have been reported by Navy pilots unlike anything they have ever witnessed.
Image credit: Enigma Labs/Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich

If you are trying to discern clarity about unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAPs, it will take time, a hale and hearty dose of nit-picking scientific scrutiny, topped off by better data gathering and diagnostic tools.

And while you’re at it, toss in need for a tightly-defined lexicon that classifies the meaning of “anomalous.”

Blue-ribbon counsel

NASA recently convened a blue-ribbon counsel of 16 independent experts that span a number of scientific and technical communities. They offered their first-cut verdict on ways to get to the bottom of reported high-flying UAP.

Image credit: Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies

The publicly open, NASA TV and Internet broadcast, multiple-hour marathon of briefings, open discussion and media questioning marked the group’s preliminary observations. The aim is to wrap up their findings and recommendations by the end of July, published in a public report.

Go to my new Scientific American story – “Bad Data, Not Aliens, May Be behind UFO Surge, NASA Team Says – More and better data are required to solve the mystery of strange apparitions in the air, the sea and space, according to NASA’s Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study team” – at:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bad-data-not-aliens-may-be-behind-ufo-surge-nasa-team-says/

Leave a Reply