The Aerospace Corporation and the Space Policy Institute at George Washington’s Elliott School of International Affairs held a lively debate on “Should the Wolf Amendment be Repealed?”
As background, nearly 15 years after its inclusion in a 2011 annual appropriations bill in the U.S. Congress, the Wolf Amendment remains a hotly debated topic.
It reflects many of the core geopolitical and philosophical issues at the heart of the debate over the U.S.-China relationship on matters of space and more.
Contrasting views
Indeed, there are contrasting views on the efficacy and relevance of the Wolf Amendment.
One view argues for retaining the amendment, clarifying its limits and pointing out possible consequences repeal could initiate.
The opposing view recommends repeal of the amendment, calling it a vestige from an earlier time that only creates more bureaucracy and waste while over-politicizing space engagements between the United States and China.
Panel participants
Dan Hart, nonresident Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council and President of HarTechnologies
Dean Cheng, nonresident Senior Fellow at the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies
Remarks from Space Policy Institute Director Scott Pace, as well as Professor of Practice of International Affairs, Robert Sutter.
The panel was moderated by Brian Weeden, Director of Civil and Commercial Policy, the Aerospace Corporation’s Center for Space Policy and Strategy.
A video view of this informative event — held on November 13th — is now available at:
Note: Special thanks to George Leaua for the link!




